Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002162025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/44/2025 Smti Gage Kayi Rigia Wife of Late Tagam Rigia, permanent and present resident of Liromoba Camp, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Aalo, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Karjum Ligo and 2 Ors Son of Shri Nyakar Ligo, permanent and resident of Liromoba, PO and PS Liromoba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Rego Bole Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Shri Binre Bole permanent resident of Rau Village PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Nyakar Ligo Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Rinya Ligo permanent and present resident of Liromoba PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Niabin Soki, Sibon Engti Advocate for the Respondent : Reken Ingo, S D Loda,Sonam Tsomo,Dani Rieyang,Tado Siga,Tali Umbey,Jumken Ete,Aruna Rai Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 19.11.2025 Heard Mr. Sibon Engti, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Reken Ingo, learned counsel for all the Opposite Parties. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 357 days in preferring the connected appeal. The reasons for delay in not filing the connected appeal within the stipulated time, has been explained by the applicant in paragraphs No. 3 & 4 of this application. Upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties and on perusal of the explanation given in the above-noted paragraph; this Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. Moreover, the respondent has no objection condoning the delay, in question. In view of the above; the delay of 357 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned. The interlocutory application stands allowed and stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant