Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23672 (RAJ)

MOHIT S/O KAMLESH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8641/2025 · 2025-08-14

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8641/2025 Mohit S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jamulkheda, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8642/2025 Manish S/o Dharmraj, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Mamulkheda, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 14/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 126/2025 registered at Police Station Man Town, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66D of IT Act and Section 13 of RPGO. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8641/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since 11.06.2025 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners have already been submitted before the concerned trial court, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and submitted the factual report. Same is take on record. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 11.06.2025 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Mohit S/o Kamlesh, 2. Manish S/o Dharmraj, in connection with FIR No. 126/2025 registered at Police Station Man Town, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8641/2025] learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu/143-144