Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24525 WP No. 13926 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 13926 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. CHANNAKESHAVA G.
S/O LATE GIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
2.
SMT. VARSHA H., W/O CHANNAKESHAVA G., AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.22, GKVK MAIN ROAD, THINDLU, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGLAURU-5600097. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI. VITTAL PRASAD S/O LATE BALARAM PRASAD AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.19, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, P.G. HALLI, VINAYAKA CIRCLE, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560003. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. VANITHA PRASAD, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH PORTION OF ORDER DATED 22.03.2024 IN RESPECT OF STATUS QUO IN O.S. NO.998/24 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE VIII ADDL CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-15) VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24525 WP No. 13926 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo reads as follows:-
"The undersigned herewith submits that the above writ petition subject matter has become infructuous as the order under challenge has already proceeded further and final order is passed before the Trial Court. Hence, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above case as infructuous in the interest of justice."
3. In terms of the memo, the writ petition stands
disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE PMR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14