Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123156 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 7295 of 2025 Applicant :- Yasin And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s - 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including charge sheet dated 20.04.2024 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 01.08.2024, of Case No. 4366 of 2024 (State Vs. Yasin and Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 105 of 2024, under Sections - 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.- Sahawar, District - Kasganj, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasganj, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicants that both the parties are residents of the same village and that alleged incident took place due to some misconception. Now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant / injured of the case does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident, the informant has not sustained any serious injury. It was submitted that the compromise filed by the parties before the Trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section - 482 Cr.P.C.. In the instant case, both the parties are residents of same place and the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. There is nothing to indicate that applicants have any criminal antecedents. The compromise filed by the parties before the Trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 7. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet and cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case against applicants, namely, Yasin, Munney Miyan, Asif and Faizan, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 528 BNSS is allowed. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 S Rawat Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad