Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23666 (AP)

Bammidi Satyavathi, v. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17067/2025 · 2025-08-10

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010334112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 17067/2025 Between: 1. BAMMIDI SATYAVATHI,, W/O LATE BAMMIDI APPARAO, AGED 59 YEARS, H NO 13-46, KAKIVANI STREET, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, YELLAMANCHILI MANDAL, YELLAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AP - 531055. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR (GENERAL), VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 3. THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ENQUIRY OFFICERCUM VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Orders, more particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS seeking to declare the punishment of removal of the petitioner from service vide orders 2 Dt.07.04.2025, passed by the 3rd respondent through proceedings Dis.No.3213 in the departmental enquiry proceedings in DE.No.8A/2022 as illegal, arbitrary, excessive and in violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the punishment of removal from service and to direct the 3rd respondent to treat the interregnum period from the date of removal from service 15-04-2025 till the date reinstatement as duty period with all monetary benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to reinstate the petitioner by suspending the Final Order of the S'"* respondent Dt.07.04.2025 in Dis.No.3213 passed in the departmental enquiry proceedings in DE.No.8A/2022, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANASURI ESWAR SAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A JAYANTHI 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Sri A. Eswar Sai, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to avail of his remedies before the appellate authority and further relief as may be permissible before this Court. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J. Date: 11.08.2025 BSM 4 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.17067 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 11.08.2025 BSM