[2025:RJ-JP:13262] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14515/2017 Suresh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad, R/o Near Chamad Temple, Ganesh Nagar, Sewar Road, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Additional Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Zone Jaipur. 3. Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bharatpur Circle, Bharatpur. 4. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Division, Bharatpur. 5. District Magistrate, Collectorate Campus, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. G.K. Sharma, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/03/2025 1. By way of filing the instant writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to pay all retiral dues along with interest to the petitioner. 2. None has put in appearance on bahalf of the petitioner. 3. The contents of the reply submitted by the respondents indicate that the petitioner stood retired on 31.03.2016 after attaining the age of superannuation and the respondents made the payment of pension and leave encashment amount to the [2025:RJ-JP:13262] (2 of 2) [CW-14515/2017] petitioner on 01.04.2016 and 17.05.2016 and thereafter, the Department of Pension made payment of regular pension and the gratuity amount to the petitioner on 27.04.2016 and the amount of State Insurance was also paid on the said date. 4. It appears that the representation was submitted by the petitioner for fixation of his selection grade upon which the department made request to the Pension Department on 01.02.2017 and accordingly, the orders were passed in the month of March, 2017. The retiral dues have been released to the petitioner immediately after the retirement of petitioner and there is no delay caused by the respondents, hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Dismissed as having become infructuous. 6. The petitioner is not entitled to get any interest as there is no delay in the part of the respondents in making payment of the retiral dues to the petitioner. 7. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Garima/81