Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23663 (BOM)

VIJAYALAXMI BAHUUDDESHIYA PRATISHTHAN THR ITS SECRETARY M.V. JADHAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/9861/2025 · 2025-08-07

Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

956&971wp9840-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 956 WRIT PETITION NO. 9840 OF 2025 Vijayalaxmi Bahuuddeshiya Pratishthan Thr Its Secretary M. V. Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 971 WRIT PETITION NO. 9861 OF 2025 Vijayalaxmi Bahuuddeshiya Pratishthan Thr Its Secretary M.v. Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Pradeep B Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for Respondents State Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.4 in both petitions ..... CORAM : MANISH PITALE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 7th August, 2025 P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is claiming to be reimbursed in light of Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 3. Issue notice. Learned A.G.P. waives service for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Learned Advocate Mr. S. R. Dheple, waives notice for Respondent No. 4. 4. We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of each of petitioner's proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as 2025:BHC-AUG:21679 956&971wp9840-25 possible and in any case, within a period of four (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, disburse the amount to them within a period of four weeks thereafter. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioners. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( MANISH PITALE, J. ) JPChavan