IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Writ Petition No. 13626 of 2025. Date of decision: 25 th August, 2025. Rohit Kumar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Addl. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The limited prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is to direct respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-4 in a time bound manner in terms of the government notification dated 20.11.2021, Annexure P-3. 3. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-4, strictly in terms of government notification dated 20.11.2021, Annexure P-3 within six weeks from today. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 25th August, 2025. (jai)