Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2366 (CHH)

Smt.Uma Mallick v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

ACQA/69/2013 · 2025-07-30

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37628 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 69 of 2013 Smt.Uma Mallick W/o.Subrata Mallick, Aged About 33 Years, R/o. Vill. Pandari Pani, P.O. Udaypur, P.S. Udaypur, Civil And Rev. Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh, ... Appellant versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The District Magistrate Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2. Brijesh Lakda, S/o Shri Jagat Ram Lakda, aged about 25 years, R/o Village – Kunkuri, Thana – Batouli, at present residence of Village – Jhirmitti, Thana – Udaypur, Civil and Revenue District – Ambikapur, Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 31.07.2025 1. Counsel for the appellant submits that earlier CRR No.519/2013 was preferred by the accused/respondent No.2 – Brijesh Lakda before this Court and the same was partly allowed on 11.03.2024 wherein the conviction of the applicant (respondent No.2 herein) was affirmed and the applicant was sentenced for the period already undergone by him. In the above circumstances, counsel for the appellant does not want to press this appeal. 2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Prakash PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2025.07.31 17:16:11 +0530