[2025:RJ-JP:10832-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 614/2024 Keshav Meena S/o Sh. Amar Lal Meena, aged About 31 Years, R/oVillage Emartapura Post Ondh Tehsil Mandrayal District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Aparna Arora, Additional Chief Secretary, Forest Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Munish Kumar Garg, The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Shri Mahesh Chand Gupta, The Chief Conservator Of Forest, Jaipur. 4. Shri Jitendra Meena, The Range Forest Officer, District Karauli. 5. Shri Sumit Bansal, The Conservator Of Forest, Karauli. 6. Shri Piyush Kumar Sharma, The Deputy Conservator Of Forest Karauli, 7. Shri Tinku Jatav, The Regional Forest Officer, Mandrayal, Dist. Karauli. 8. Shir Nilabh Saxena, The District Collector And District Magistrate, Karauli. 9. Shri Brajesh Gupta, The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mandrayal, District Karauli. 10. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal with Mr. Abilasha Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG with Ms. Aditi Vats HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order [2025:RJ-JP:10832-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-614/2024] 10/03/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 04.01.2024 passed in D. B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No.20691/2023. 2. Though submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order of the Court is not complied with, from the reply of the respondents it is revealed that as far as temporary huts are concerned, that has already been removed and for removal of pacca construction, after passing order under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act, 1956, notice was issued for removal and towards that a letter was sent to the District Collector on 25.02.2025 for providing police force so that there may not be any resistance over the removal of the encroachment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also disclosed to this Court today during the course of hearing that person against whom, the proceedings had been initiated and who were going to be removed, has approached this Court by filing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3142/2025, wherein there is an interim order passed by this Court on 28.02.2025. 4. In view of the reply which has been filed by the respondents and the disclosure made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this contempt petition cannot proceed and is closed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Tanisha/14