Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010333302024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0? MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17013 OF 2024 Between: Ravi Sudhakar, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged about 74 years R/o. D.No.33-620/3, N.H- 5 Road, Chilakaluripeta Town, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. -522616 ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District Andhra
2. The Deputy General of Police, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu.. 4. The Station House Officer, Chilakuluripeta Town Police Station Palnadu District. 5. Tati Anjaneyulu, S/o. Venkateswarlu, Aged about Kolalapudi, Martur Mandal, Prakasam District. - 523261
6. Saadineni Venkateswarlu, S/o. Saadineni Lakshmaiah years, R/o. Kolalapudi, Martur Mandal Prakasam District. Home Pradesh. 68 years, R/o. Aged about 61 - 523261 ...Respondents praying tha| in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature! of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of respondent no. 4 in harassing the Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may be
€ petitioner by summoning him to the respondent no.4 police station at the behest respondent no. 5 and 6 and interfering in a civil dispute pending vide O.S.No. 10 of 2024 and O.S.No. 11 of 2024 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judgel Narasaraopet as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice. Article 14, 19, 21, 300-A of Indian Constitution and consequently direct respondent no.3 to not to summon the petitioner to the respor^dent no.4 police station without any proper notice under the any civil dispute. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Tespondentno.4 to not to summon the petitioner without any proper notice; under the guise of any civil dispute pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME ^ i Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: SMT.
KAVITHA GOTTIPATI The Court made the following order: guise of
APHC010333302024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17013/2024 Between:
1.RAVI SUDHAKAR, S/0. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/0. D.NO.33-620/3. N.H-5 ROAD. CHILAKALURIPETA TOWN GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. - 5226ld ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE DEPUTY GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIf^l ANDHRA PRADESH. VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVAtl 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU.. i I 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. CHILAKULURIPEtA TOWN POLICE STATION PALNADU DISTRICT. I 5.TATI ANJANEYULU. S/0. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. KOLALAPUDI, MARTUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. - 523261 6.SAADINENI LAKSHMAIAH KOLALAPUDI, MARTUR MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT.! - VENKATESWARLU, S/0. SAADINENI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.
3 523261 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the action of respondent no. 4 in harassing the petitioner by summoning him to the respondent no.4 police station at the behest respondent no. 5 and 6 and interfering in a civil dispute pending vide O.S.No. 10 of 2024 and O.S.No. 11 of 2024 on the file pf Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice.
Article 14, 19, 21, 300-A of Indian Constitution and consequently direct respondent no.3 to not to summon the petitioner to the respondent no.4 police station without any proper notice under the ^uise of any civil dispute and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to respondentno.4 to not to summon the petitioner without any proper notice under the guise of any civil dispute pending disposal of the direct above writ petition and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC ctircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the Counter affidavit copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the writ petition in the interest of justice and to pass praying that in the lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. % the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave and permit the Respondent No.5 and 6 to file counter affidavit and Counsel for the Petitioner: pass 1.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GPFOR HOME 2.KAVITHAGOTTIPATI
The Court made the following ordpr: i
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted as this Court passed interim orders in other writ petitions vide W.P.Nos. 10298 2025 and 17462, 18960 & 26381 of 2024 of which are connected to this writ petition, there remains nothing for adjudication in the present writ petition. As such, prayed to close the writ petition.
2. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTld^FFICER To
1. One CC to M/s. Pillix Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
3. One CC to Smt. Kavitha Gottipati Advocate [OPUC]
4. Wo CD Copies [OUT] TF
HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025
ORDER WP NO. 17013 OF 2024 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS