Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23646 (GAU)

Sh. Lianchungnunga and 4 Ors. v. The State of Mizoram and 3 Ors.

I.A.(Civil)/90/2025 · 2025-11-16

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030007652025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/90/2025 Sh. Lianchungnunga and 4 Ors. S/o Sh. Hrangaia (L) R/o Chaltlang Dawrkawn Aizawl 2: Smt. Lalawmpuii D/o Lianchungnunga R/o Chaltlang Dawrkawn Aizawl 3: Smt. Esther Zorinmawii D/o Lianchungnunga R/o Chaltlang Dawrkawn Aizawl 4: Smt. Lianhmingthangi (now dead) Represented by Sh. Lianchungnunga R/o Chaltlang Dawrkawn Aizawl 5: Sh. Lalliankima S/o Hrangaia (L) R/o Chanmari Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 3 Ors. Represented by its Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl Page No.# 2/3 2:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Government of Mizoram Aizawl 3:The Collector/Deputy Commissioner Aizawl District Aizawl 4:The Chairman Presbyterian Church Vaivakawn Pastor Bial Aizawl Phunchawng Veng Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Dinari T Azyu Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR JUDGMENT / ORDER Date : 17-11-2025 It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant that since the appeal stands admitted and the interim order has already in operation, this I.A(C) may be disposed directing the parties to maintain status-quo as of today during the pendency of the appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said prayer since the interim order is already operating during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, I.A.(C) stands closed by directing the parties to maintain Page No.# 3/3 status-quo as of today on the suit land during the pendency of the appeal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant