IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No.489 of 2024 ----- The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand and others ....... Appellants/Respondents Versus Murari Bhagat … … Respondent/Petitioner ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ------- For the Appellants : Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate …….. Order No.26/Dated: 12th September, 2025 1. This is a disposed of matter listed on Board today under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on the basis of the mention made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent for the reason that the name of the learned counsel representing the private respondent concerned has not been referred in the order dated 14.08.2025. 2. A similar prayer has also been made on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-State. 3. We have perused the record as also Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the parties and found that the reference of the name of the appearing counsel as per the details furnished by the learned counsel appearing for the private respondent as well as the appellant-State has not been referred in the order dated 14.08.2025. 4. Hence, the order dated 14.08.2025 is modified to the extent by referring the names of the learned counsel who have argued the matter along with the learned counsel who are on record. 5. In view of the above, let the name of the following learned counsel be shown in the order dated 14.08.2025 for the respective parties: “For the Appellants: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate General Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III Mr. Shahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG For the Respondent: Mr. Jitendra Singh, Sr. Advocate Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate Mr. Yash Singh, Advocate Mr. Ishan Singh, Advocate” 2 6. Accordingly, the order dated 14.08.2025 is modified to the above extent. 7. The remaining part of the order shall remain intact. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Sudhir