HARPREET SINGH @ HARPPY AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/15400/2025 · 2025-05-19
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23643 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23643 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-15400-2025 -1- 304 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15400-2025 Date of Decision:19.05.2025 Harpreet Singh @ Happy and others …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and another …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Sarbjit Singh Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amardeep Singh Mann, Advocate for respondent No.2 *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S for quashing of FIR No. 170, dated 10.08.2023, registered under Sections 341, 323, 506, 149 of IPC, at Police Station City-2, Mansa, District Mansa (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 14.12.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2. Vide order dated 24.03.2025, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 14.12.2024 (Annexure P-2). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mansa and got their statements recorded. Report dated 07.05.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. HEMLATA 2025.05.20 23:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-15400-2025 -2-
4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6. Resultantly, FIR No. 170, dated 10.08.2023, registered under Sections 341, 323, 506, 149 of IPC, at Police Station City-2, Mansa, District Mansa (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 14.12.2024 (Annexure P-2) are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 19.05.2025
JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.05.20 23:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document