Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23641 (RAJ)

VISHNU SINGH CHAUHAN S/O SHRI PRAHLAD SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8669/2025 · 2025-08-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8047/2025 Sajal Agarwal D/o Shri Ishwar Agarwal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 14, Pareekon Ka Mohalla, Shrimadhopur, Police Station Shrimadhopur, District Sikar. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8669/2025 Vishnu Singh Chauhan S/o Shri Prahlad Singh Chauhan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Toliwada Tarauwas District Dausa At Present R/o B-1/4 Flat Number 12, Dwarika Apartment Sector 26, Pratap Nagar, P.s. Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9743/2025 Imran Khan S/o Shri Raju Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mau, Tehsil Hindaun, Police Station Nai Mandi Hindaun District Karauli (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarthak Choubey for Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma Mr. Pankaj Gupta Mr. Aditya Joshi for Mr. N.K. Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amar Kumar and Ms. Savita Nathawat Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP [2025:RJ-JP:32345] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8047/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/08/2025 1. Considered submission of learned counsel appearing for petitioners, learned Senior Advocate appearing for complainant and learned Public Prosecutor. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits that these bail applications rendered infructuous as FIR has been quashed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. 3. Having considered aforesaid, the bail applications are dismissed as rendered infructuous. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /05-07