1 APHC010333752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22133/2020 Between: 1. O.N.BALAGOPALA REDDY, S/ O O.N.NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION R/O K.BASAVANAPALLI, H/ O KIRIKERA, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PENUKONDA, ANANTHAPURAM DIST. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 2-TOWN P.S. HINDUPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR, 2-TOWN P.S. HINDUPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 5. S HUMAYUN BASHA, S/O LATE SATTAR KHAN AGED 54 YEARS R/O 2-1-1, JVS LANE, MUKKADIPETA, HINDUPUR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writs Order or Direction declaring the action of Respondent No 2 to 4 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered him and in interfering with the civil liberties of petitioner and civil disputes interse the petitioner and 5th Respondent as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction and violative of Art 14 of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No 2 to 4 not to interfere with the civil liberties of petitioner and not to interfere 2 with the civil disputes between petitioner and 5th Respondent and also not to call the petitioner to Police Station without there being any crime registered against him Award costs” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22133 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr