Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23630 (RAJ)

M/S K H C MILK AND PANEER HOUSE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLW/247/2016 · 2025-01-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:223] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.247/2016 M/s K.H.C. Milk And Paneer House, Proprietor Shri Hargurudas Singh Son Of Shri Gurmale Singh, Milk Vendor, 55, Shiv Colony, Truck Union Pooli, Shriganganagar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner (Food Safety) Cum Director (Public Health) Medical And Health Services Rajasthan Jaipur 3. Shri Pradeep Kumar Rajput, Food Safety Officer, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Shriganganagar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/01/2025 1. The instant petition has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 29.01.2016 passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Sriganganagar by which the petitioner has been found guilty under Section 26 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and a fine of Rs.50,000/- has been imposed upon the petitioner. 2. It appears that aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, the petitioner had preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Food Safety) cum Director (Public Health) Medical and Health Services Jaipur, however, the same was returned by the Commissioner vide [2025:RJ-JP:223] (2 of 2) [CRLW-247/2016] order dated 16.05.2016 observing therein that Food Safety Appellate Tribunal has not been constituted, hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition. 3. This Court is aware that now Food Safety Appellate Tribunal has been constituted and the same is functional, hence under these circumstances, the instant petition stands disposed of with direction to the Office to send this petition to the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal after retaining the photocopies of this petition on the record. 4. Since the parties to this petition have remained absent and they are not aware about passing of this order, it is expected from the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal to issue notice to the petitioner as well as the respondent before proceeding further. 5. For statistical purpose, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. 6. It is expected from the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal to expedite the proceedings of the appeal and all possible endeavours be made for expeditious disposal of the appeal. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/314