IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C). No. 893 of 2024 ---------- Nand Kishor Yadav @ Nand Kishore Yadav, son of late Dewal Yadav, resident of village-Ambedkar Nagar, P.O. Redma South, P.S. Daltonganj, Dist. Palamau. … … Petitioner - V E R S U S – 1. Mr. Vinay Saluja, Assistant General Manager (Pension), Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office-10A, Middleton Row, Kolkata, P.O. Middleton Row, P.S. Park Street, Kolkata, West Bengal. 2. Mr. Manoj Kumar, General manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office At. Kutchery Chowk, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi. 3. Mr. Vivek Poddar, Manager (IR)/ Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, New Collectoriate Building, Phase-II, 4th Floor, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, PS Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi. 4. Mr. Yashpal Singh, Manager (IR)/ Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Officer, near DIG Bunglow, in front of Palamau Hospital, Bye Pass Road, Daltonganj, Dist. Palamau. 5. Mr. Manish Kumar, Food Storage Depot., Ranchi, Food Corporation of India, Kutchery Road, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi. 6. Mr. Sushil Topno, Manager (Depot), FCI, Food Storage Depot, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, Dist. Palamau. 7. Mr. Sushil Topno, Depot In-charge, FCI, Food Storage Depot, Daltonganj, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, Dist. Palamau. 8. Mr. Avinash Sinha, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Kolkata, Zonal Office-10A, Middleton Row, Kolkata, P.O. Middleton Row, P.S. Park Street, Dist. Kolkata-71, West Bengal. 9. The State of Jharkhand …….. Opp. Parties. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate Mr. Sudhanshu Singh, Advocate Mr. Shubham Sinha, Advocate ---------- 05/ 09.01.2025 Heard the parties. It has been very fairly submitted by learned counsel for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 7 that the order of this Court has already been 2 complied with and entire retiral benefits along with cost of Rs.50,000/- as awarded by this Court has been paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) kunal