v- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2474 OF 2016 Between: S.Madan Mohan @ Madan, S/o.Late Suryudu, aged about 26 R/o.Kothapeta, Kurnool. years ...Petitioner (Petitioner/Accused No.1) y^AND 1. The State of AP., through; S.H.O., II Town Police Station, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 2. N.Srinivasulu, S/o.Giriswamy,' aged about 35 Kadakpura, Kurnool Town. years, R/o. 17/37, ...Respondents (Respondents/Defacto Complainant) Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the.affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Coi^rt i^ay be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the Order, dated 18-07-2016 Crl.MP.No.509 of 2015 in SC.No.216 of 2015 passed in on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool. • ' V . /• LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP. NO: 3«2fi OF ^ ^ Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the in support of the petition, the High proceedings including the j on the file of the I pending disposal of the Criminal Court may be pleased to grant stay all further appearan/s-e of the petitioner in S!C.No.216 of 2015 Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool, Revision Case. Counsel for the Petitioner :Srl J.Janakirami Reddy Counsel for the Respondent Noil : Assistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No;2:^- 'if, i „ The Court made the following / / / / APHC010333082016 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) / [3521] I FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2474/2016 Between: ...PETITIONER S.madan Mohan @ Madan, Kurnool. AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of AP Rep PP and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): I 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER; The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous inasmuch as the learned Trial Court gave acquittal to the petitioner/accused. 2. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is *^'smissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ’ SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional Sessions records) 2. The Station House Officer, District. 3. One CG to Sri J.JanakiramI 4. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminai Amaravati. 6. Two CD Copies Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District . (With II Town Police Station Kurnool, Kurnool Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at BSV AL \ \ r HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 \ ORDER CRLRC.No.2474 of 2016 ^ 0 8 AUG 2025 )g intSei DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS •> '■