Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23617 (RAJ)

GIRDHARI MEENA S/O SHRI SHYOJI LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8690/2025 · 2025-08-01

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30321] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8690/2025 Girdhari Meena S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Meena, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vijaypura, Tehsil Niwai, P.s. Baroni, District Tonk At Present R/o Government Quarter F-68, Gandhi Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur. Suspended Section Officer Personnel (K-4/2) Department Secretariat, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.299/2023 registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and Sections 43, 66 & 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that it appears from the record that petitioner has been made scapegoat to save the actual culprits. It is submitted that arrest of the petitioner has been made in this case without proper investigation. He submits that entire offence is based on documents and same are in possession of the Investigating Agency. Counsel submits that petitioner is a government servant and he is not a flight risk. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2025 and [2025:RJ-JP:30321] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8690/2025] further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that entire offence is based on documents which is in possession of the Investigating Agency and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Girdhari Meena S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /275