Kannabiran v. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/4157/2025 · 2025-03-18
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23617 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23617 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025
1. Kannabiran Son of Kovinthasamy @ Govinthasomy, No.160, Vinayaga Kovil Street, Vinayagapuram, Vanura, Villupuram-605 109.
2. Arputharaj Son of Azhagesan, No.9BA Mariyamman Koil Street, Vinayagapuram Semangalam Post, Vanur, Villupuram - 605 109. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kottakuppam Police Station, Villuppuram, Cr.No. 484 of 2024. Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 PRAYER To enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Crime No. 484 of 2024 on the file of the respondent and thus render justice.
CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr. Gowthamraj M For Respondent: Mr. S. Santhosh, Govt. Advocate ORDER This is the second anticipatory bail application before this Court. The earlier anticipatory bail application in Crl.O.P.No. 1537 of 2025 was dismissed on 23.01.2025 by Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira and this anticipatory bail petition is listed before this Court pursuant to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.31787 of 2024 on
04.03.2025.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners robbed the thali chain weighing about 12 grams and silver lamp from the complainant's house and also they attempted to commit theft in other two houses in the same village. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025
3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that though in the earlier order it is shown that the first petitioner has 10 previous cases and the second petitioner has 4 previous cases, however, on verification, it is seen that the first petitioner has 4 previous cases and the second petitioner has 2 previous cases and there is no change in circumstances. He further submitted that the stolen articles have not recovered.
4. This Court is of the view that there is no change in circumstances and hence, is not inclined to entertain this second anticipatory bail petition.
5. Hence, the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed. 18-03-2025 AT https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. AT CRL OP No. 4157 of 2025 To 1.The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kottakuppam Police Station, Villuppuram, Cr.No. 484 of 2024. Crl. O.P. No. 4157 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis