[ 2025:JHHC:26395] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4983 of 2025 Sarvjeet Yadav, aged about 36 years, S/o Sankata Prasad Yadav, R/o Manoharpur, Pahara, P.O. & P.S. Mirzapur, District Mirzapur, (Uttar Pradesh). ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 01.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Baghmara P.S. Case No. 79 of 2023, registered for the offences under Sections 379, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Rule 9/13 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the FIR has been lodged against some accused and also against the owner of the truck and the petitioner and his brother namely Santosh Yadav are the registered owner of the alleged truck, bearing registration number UP-65-AT-6810 and hence the name of the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. He submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-21 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that serious allegations are there against the petitioner and the same has been taken care of by the learned Sessions [ 2025:JHHC:26395] -2- Judge while rejecting the petition of the petitioner. 5. It transpires from the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge that in para-123 of the case diary, it has come that co- accused Santosh Yadav has produced a release order of the seized vehicle along with the documents of vehicle and on physical verification of engine number and chassis number of the vehicle bearing registration number UP-63-AT-6810 is found different from the paper produced by the owner of the truck. Further in para-259 of the case diary, it has come that co-accused Santosh Yadav playing fraud with the court and police, got release order of the seized vehicle and plied two vehicles using one number plate putting revenue loss to the Government and further it has also come in the said order that the petitioner and his own brother co-accused Santosh Yadav have running a racket using one number plate in two vehicles for transportation of illegal coal. 6. In view of the above, I am not inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-