Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030005122025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/127/2025 State of Mizoram R/b the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Public Works Department, Aizawl VERSUS Sh C.Lianmawia and 4 Ors. R/o Saiphai, Kolasinb District, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr C Lalfakzuala Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R4 & R5 Linked Case : LA.App./6/2025 State of Mizoram R/b the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram PWD Department Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Sh C.Lianmawia and 4 Ors. R/o Saiphai Kolasib District Mizoram 2:Sh Remliana R/o Vairengte Page No.# 2/4 Kolasib District 3:Sh RS Lalthlengliana R/o Saiphai Kolasib District 4:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 5:The District Collector Kolasib Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr C Lalfakzuala Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R4 & R5 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/201/2025 The State of Mizoram R/by Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram PWD Department Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Sh C.Lianmawia and 4 Ors. R/o Saiphai Kolasib District Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. C Lalfakzuala Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R4 & R5 Page No.# 3/4 B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER 18.11.2025 On the disposal of I.A.(Civil) No 127/2025 allowing the condonation of the delay, this court has heard the learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. C.Lalfakzuala, learned counsel who submits that there are sufficient grounds for setting aside the Judgment & Order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Kolasib District in LA Case No.16/2025. The learned counsel submits that the learned reference court had passed the award based on a superseded award, whereas, the learned Reference court should have passed an award based on the revised award dated 07.08.2018. Appeal is admitted. Issue notice to the respondents through registered post with A/D within 3 working days, returnable by 3 weeks. Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned Govt. Advocate submits that the appellant has made the Land Revenue & Settlement Department and the District Collector, Kolasib as respondent Nos. 11 & 12. However, these State department cannot be made the respondents in the instant appeal. She therefore, prayed that their names may be struck off from being arrayed as respondents Nos. 11 & 12 in the Page No.# 4/4 instant LA Appeal. Mr. C. Lalfakzuala, learned counsel for the appellant has also prayed that the names of respondents Nos. 11 & 12 have been mistakenly included in the said LA. Appeal and prayed that respondent Nos. 11 & 12 may be struck off. In view of the above submission, this court finds it appropriate to strike out the names of the respondent Nos. 11 & 12. Registry to do the needful. List the matter after 3 (three) weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant