Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23612 (JHR)

SITARAM SINGH v. BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

C.M.P./507/2022 · 2025-02-14

Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.507 of 2022 ------ Sitaram Singh, age about 68 years, son of late Mousadi Singh, resident of Sri Ram Path, Panki Road, Baralota, P.O. Medninagar, P.S. Medninagar, District-Palamau …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Sone Bhawan, Vir Chand Patel Path, P.O. and P.S.-R-Block, District, Patna-800001. 2. Chief of Audit, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, having its office at Sone Bhawan, Vir Chand Patel Path, P.O. and P.S.-R. Block, District-Patna-800001. 3. Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi, District Ranchi- 834004 (Jharkhand). 4. The District Manager, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Palamau, P.O., P.S. and District-Palamau. 5. The State of Jharkhand, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Project Bhawan, P.O., P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi .... .... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Amrita Sinha, Advocate Ms. Shweta Suman, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhanshu Kr. Singh, AC to SC-III For the Resp.3 & 4 : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the JSFC : Mr. Sharon Toppo, AC to Dr. A.K. Singh ------ 05/Dated: 14.02.2025 1. After some argument, learned counsel appearing for the 2 petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with a liberty to ventilate his/her grievance before the appropriate forum. 2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the opposite parties. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) Rohit/-