HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 47298 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Sri Madhava Nand Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the proceeding in S.T. No. 1253 of 2025 (State Vs. Anuj and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 34 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 333, 352, 351(3), 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station Sikhera, District Muzaffar Nagar, pending before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar and charge sheet dated 27.04.2025 as well as cognizance order dated 06.06.2025 in terms of compromise. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party nos.2 and 3 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing this application under 528 BNSS with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties and this Court vide order dated 18.12.2025 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 23.01.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party nos.2 and 3 compromised the matter and opposite party Nos.2 and 3 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party nos.2 and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Madhava Nand Shukla Anuj And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 3 have settled their dispute through compromise and, as such, opposite party nos.2 and 3 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party nos.2 and 3 are ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non- compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, proceeding in S.T. No. 1253 of 2025 (State Vs. Anuj and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 34 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 333, 352, 351(3), 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station Sikhera, District Muzaffar Nagar, pending before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar and charge sheet dated 27.04.2025 as well as cognizance order dated 06.06.2025, are hereby quashed in terms of compromise. 8. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. April 27, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 47298 of 2025 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad