Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23608 (KAR)

SHAKIL @ SHAMSHEER @ SHAMSHEEN v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5497/2025 · 2025-06-12

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20260 CRL.P No. 5497 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5497 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: SHAKIL @ SHAMSHEER @ SHAMSHEEN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O. ZUBAIR, R/AT DOOR NO.268 (10/19), FATHIMA MANZIL, NO.4, KOTTAM, PERILCHERI PANCHAYAT, MUNDALUR THALACHERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, KERALA – 670 662. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TALHA ISMAIL BENGRE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MANGALURU NORTH PS, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, REPRESENTD BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. Z. MOHAMMD AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED, R/AT KUDKODIGUDDE, KANKANADY, MANGALORE – 575 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND CHARGE SHEET REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT POLICE OF MANGALURU Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20260 CRL.P No. 5497 of 2025 NORTH PS AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN IN FIR BEARING CR.NO.128/2014, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 417, 506, 465, 471 OF IPC AND SECTION 66A, 66B, 66E AND 67A OF I.T. ACT, 2000, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE 2ND J.M.F.C. COURT AT MANGALORE IN C.C.NO.678/2015, D.K. DISTRCT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file discharge application before the Trial Court, if charges are not already framed by the Trial Court. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file discharge application before the Trial Court, if the charges are not already framed by the Trial Court. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26