Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030000282025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/8/2025 Bethany Hospital and 2 Ors. A registered partnership firm, Through its partners namely - a) Sh. Lalhmunsiama Ralte b) Vanlalruata Ralte 2: Sh. Lalhmunsiama Ralte 3: Sh. Vanlalruata Ralte VERSUS Sh. Raymond Laldosanga House no. C-22, Republic Veng, Aizawl, Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/9/2025 Bethany Hospital and 2 Ors. Mission Veng Aizawl Mizoram 2: Sh. Lalhmunsiama Ralte S/o Rev. Lalrinawma R/o A-29 Mission Veng L. Colney Building Page No.# 2/4 Aizawl Mizoram 3: Sh. Vanlalruata Ralte S/o Rev. Lalrinawma R/o A-29 Mission Veng L. Colney Building Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Sh. Raymond Laldosanga House no. C-22 Republic Veng Aizawl Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : RFA/2/2025 Bethany Hospital and 2 Ors. A registered partnership firm Through its partners namely - a) Sh. Lalhmunsiama Ralte b) Vanlalruata Ralte 2: Sh. Lalhmunsiama Ralte S/o Rev. Lalrinawma R/o A-29 Mission Veng L. Colney building Aizawl Mizoram 3: Sh. Vanlalruata Ralte S/o Rev. Lalrinawma R/o A-29 Mission Veng L. Colney building Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Sh. Raymond Laldosanga R/o House No. C-22 Page No.# 3/4 Republic Veng Aizawl Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. C Lalhruaitluanga BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER 01.12.2025 Heard Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for the applicant along with Mr. K. Vanlalneihpuia, learned counsel for the opposite party/respondent. The learned counsel for the applicant has prayed for adjournment of the matter by submitting that the parties are making an attempt to come to an amicable settlement outside Court. The learned counsel for the opposite party/respondent on the other hand submitted that the instant Interlocutory Application and the connected Regular First Appeal filed and registered as RFA No. 2 of 2025 are liable to be dismissed, since the amount in the connected Civil Suit No. 107 of 2017 is Rs. 8,16,690 (Rupees eight lakhs sixteen thousand six hundred and ninety)only and thus in view of the Mizoram Civil Courts (Amendment) 2021, the proper forum to file the Regular First Appeal would be before the District Judge. On considering the submissions made by the learned counsels, this Page No.# 4/4 Court finds that since the amount involved in the connected Regular First Appeal and the Civil Suit is Rs. 8,16,690 (Rupees eight lakhs sixteen thousand six hundred and ninety)only the appropriate forum should have been the Court of the District Judge. It is also noted that it is submitted that the parties are trying to come to an amicable settlement outside Court, it would therefore be in the best interest for both the parties, if an amicable settlement can be arrived at. Accordingly, I.A.(Civil) No. 8 of 2025 along with the connected RFA No. 2 of 2025 and I.A.(Civil) No. 9 of 2025 stands disposed on dismissal. The parties are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, as per law, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant