[2025:RJ-JP:30404-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ (Habeas Corpus) Petition No. 237/2025 Rambabu S/o Shri Tarachand, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 21 Jay Bhawani Nagar Rambag, Needad, Ward No. 01, Harmada, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Secretariate, Jaipur 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur 3. The Additional Director, General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur Rajasthan 5. The Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan West, Jaipur 6. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, Jaipur Raj. 7. The S.H.O. Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur 8. Ramesh S/o Shimbhu, Aged About 55 Years 9. Vikki S/o Ramesh, Aged About 25 Years 10. Mastu S/o Gunaram, Aged About 50 Years 11. Chand, W/o Mastu 12. Temi, W/o Ramesh 13. Reena, W/o Vikki aged about 22 years 14. Mangti W/o Sonu, aged 30 years, R/o Kachchi Basti Bharat-Nagar, Lohamandi Road, Sikar Road, Jaipur Raj. 15. Radha W/o Bati, aged 35 years R/o Mali Ki Kothi, Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur 16. Sonu S/o Mannaram, aged 30 years R/o J.D.A. Kachchi Basti Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 17. Kamla Devi W/o Lt. Shri Rinku D/o Shisupal aged 34 yeras, R/o Wairi Tarpura Tehsil Nawalgad District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:30404-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-237/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Udaibhan, CI SHO, Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 07/08/2025 Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has submitted the factual report dated 06.08.2025 furnished to him by SHO Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West). The said report is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the report, the corpus is living with the petitioner and submits that by efflux of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Sudeepak/14