TIRAT CHANDRA BORO@ TIROT CHANDRA BORO v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/2845/2025 · 2026-02-18
Pranjal Das
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2360 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2360 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010265712025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2845/2025 TIRAT CHANDRA BORO@ TIROT CHANDRA BORO S/O LT KERPA RAM BORO,R/O NIPCCD CAMPUS, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KHANAPARA, PS DISPUR, DIST KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI, S YESMIN,MR K THAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER 19.02.2026
1. Heard Mr. D. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Tirat Chandra Boro @ Tirot
Page No.# 2/2 Chandra Boro, with the apprehension of arrest in the context of certain allegations made against him which lead to making GD No.13 dated
17.08.2025.
3. He was granted some interim protection and a report was called for.
4. Pursuant thereof, report dated 02.02.2026 has been received that no case has been registered against the petitioner till now.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after grant of interim protection the petitioner had appeared before the IO and rendered his co- operation.
6. Considering the fact that no case has been registered against the petitioner under any non bailable penal provision, the petition for pre- arrest bail would be not maintainable at this stage and accordingly
disposed of.
7. In the event of any new facts emerging giving rise to fresh bonafide apprehension, the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to the applicable provisions of law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant