Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23599 (JHR)

EHSAN KHAN ALIAS MD EHSAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5289/2025 · 2025-09-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:28165 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 5289 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5289 of 2025 1. Ehsan Khan @ Md. Ehsan Khan, aged about 47 years 2. Jishan Khan, aged about 33 years 3. Hasan Mantu, aged about 22 years, all sons of Sajmul Hussain 4. Ejaj Khan, aged about 22 years 5. Toshik Khan @ Tousif Khan, aged about 20 years, both sons of Late Meraj Khan, all residents of Village- Amwatikar, P.O. & P.S. Latehar, District- Latehar … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate ----- 04/15.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.113/2024, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109, 126(2), 115(2), 125(b), 303(2) and 324(3) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned C.J.M., Latehar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had earlier filed A.B.A. No.6115 of 2024 and there is changed circumstance and in view of that, the present anticipatory bail application has been filed. She submits that in view of that, anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the State and informant jointly opposed the prayer and submit that there is no change in the circumstance and in view of that, this application may kindly be dismissed. 5. It transpires that there is no change in the circumstance. ( 2025:JHHC:28165 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 5289 of 2025 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move before the learned Court. 7. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 8. It is made clear that if any petition is filed by the petitioners, the learned Court shall decide the same in accordance with law without being prejudiced to this order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 15th September, 2025 Ajay/