IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11484 of 2024 Decided on 20th March 2025 M/s Ruchira Printing and Packaging …Petitioner Versus UOI and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: M/s K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate, with Ms Sneh Bhimta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. V.B. Verma, Central Govt. Counsel, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. V.B. Verma, learned Central Government Counsel and Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised by the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment 2 of Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court, passed in CWP No.10600 of 2024, titled as Atul Sharma Versus Union of India & others, alongwith connected matters, decided on 06.01.2025 and it would be in the interest of justice in case this Writ Petition is disposed of in the light of the findings returned by Hon’ble Coordinate Bench in Para-21 thereof, by ordering that the same be construed to have been passed in the present Writ Petition. 3. As it could not be disputed by learned counsel for the respondents that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment being relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of, as prayed for, with the observation that the findings returned in CWP No.10600 of 2024 (Supra), shall be construed to have been passed in the present Writ Petition also. Para-21 thereof is being quoted hereinbelow:- “21. Consequently, in view of the detailed discussion made herein as well as law taken into consideration, this Court finds merit in the present petitions and accordingly same are allowed with a direction to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to place the matter before the Empowered Committee chaired by Secretary, DIPP, constituted in terms of Clause 6.1 of the Scheme, for registration expeditiously, preferably 3 within a period of four weeks, without being influenced by letters dated 9.11.2023 and 30.07.2024. Needless to say, petitioners shall be granted incentives, as prayed for, in terms of the Scheme, if they are found eligible. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Interim order, if any, is vacated.” 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 20, 2025 (Vinod)