Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23591 (CAL)

DIPTORAJ CHAKRABORTY AND OTHERS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/2094/2025 · 2025-05-14

Jay Sengupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.05.2025 Item No.DL115 Court No. 28 Asraf, AR(Ct.) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 2094 of 2025 DIPTORAJ CHAKRABORTY & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. For the Petitioners : Mr. Manojit Bhattacharya Mrs. Sumitra Bhattacharya Mr. Arijit Chakraborty …..Advocates Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioner no.1 is the son of the petitioner nos.2 and 3. The petitioner no.1 had taken a temporary accommodation loan from a friend but the said friend made this look like a criminal case and instituted the present complaint. Even the parents of the petitioner no.1 were falsely implicated in this case. No prima facie case is made out against the petitioners which would appear from a plain reading of the petition of complaint. The associates of the complainant / opposite party are preventing the petitioners from attending the Trial Court. A warrant of Arrest is likely to be issued against the petitioners. It does not appear that any Warrant of Arrest has been issued against the petitioners. In the above circumstances, which are very peculiar indeed, the petitioners shall make all endeavour to appear before the learned Trial Court on the next date fixed. If they face any impediment, they shall be at liberty to approach the Page 2 concerned authorities including the police or the Registry of the Court for seeking necessary help. No further order needs be passed in this regard. Accordingly, the instant revisional application is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. ( Jay Sengupta, J. )