Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23590 (KAR)

S. N. SRIDHARA v. ASHIYA BI

WP/11406/2025 · 2025-06-04

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18844 WP No. 11406 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11406 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: S. N. SRIDHARA S/O LAKSHMAN RAO NADIGA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O VINAYAKA NAGARA, 1ST CROSS, SHIKARIPURA TOWN - 577 427, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASHIYA BI D/O HANAGAL IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O NEAR SYED MOHHADIN MANJIL KHUBA MASJID, ANWAR COLONY EXTENSION, BADRAVATHI TOWN - 577 245, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 2. JUBED BI W/O SYED GAFFAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/O OPP. TO KHUBA MASJID, HOLLEHONNUR ROAD - 577 245, ANWAR COLONY EXTENSION, BHADRAVATHI TOWN TALUK, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18844 WP No. 11406 of 2025 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 3. MAIMUNNISA, W/O B. NAZEER AHMED, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/O D.B KERI, 1ST CROSS, SHIRALAKOPPA TOWN, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 4. MAHEER UNNISA, W/O ALLA BHAKSHA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/O ABDUL HAMEED ROAD, SHIRALAKOPPA TOWN, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 5. FIROZ BEGUM, W/O SAMMI ULLA KHAN, AGED BOUT 77 YEARS, 6. MOHAMMED ILIYAS, S/O HANAGAL IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 7. MOHAMMED JABBI ULLA, S/O HANAGAL IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 8. MOHAMMED ISAK, S/O HANAGAL IBRAHIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18844 WP No. 11406 of 2025 9. HASSIBA KHATOON, W/O MOHAMMED ILIYAS, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 10. TAHA ANJUM, D/O MOHAMMED ILIYAS, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 11. TAHIRA HASAN, S/O MOHAMMED ILIYAS, AGED BOUT 38 YEARS. 12. TOWSIF HASAN, S/O MOHAMMED ILIYAS, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 13. TASMIYA MAHABOOB, W/O WASIM SHEIK REHAMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, THE RESPONDENT NO.5 TO 13 R/O OPP. TO OLD HP PETROL BUNK, H.K ROAD, SHIRALKOPPA TOWN, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. 14. HARSHA .B S/O BASAVARAJA GOUDRU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. 15. PRADEEP. E PATIL S/O ERANA GOUDA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. THE RESPONDENT NO. 14 AND 15 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18844 WP No. 11406 of 2025 ARE R/O DIRECTORS OF HARSHADEEP DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., SIRSI TOWN - 581 401, UTTARAKANNADA DISTRICT. 16. SMT. UMMESALMA, W/O JAKIR KHAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O BOVI COLONY, SHIRALKOPPA TOWN - 577 427, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ABHISHEK M.K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R12 AND R16; SRI. MAHESH R DHARMAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R14 AND R15) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A ) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 22.03.2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE LEARNED SNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIKARIPURA REJECTING THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO COME ON RECORDS AS AN ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS TO SUIT OS NO. 5/2022 PRODUCED AS ANNX-M TO THE WP AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18844 WP No. 11406 of 2025 "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The counsel appearing for the petitioner submits as under:- The above writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.03.2025 passed by the court of learned Senior civil Judge and JMFC, Shikaripura in O.S.No.5/2022 thereby rejecting the application made by the petitioner seeking to implead him as additional defendant to the suit. During pendency of the above writ petition the lis between the petitioner and the respondents has been amicably settled and thereby it has rendered the above writ petition infructuous and therefore the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition by allowing this memo in the interest of justice." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56 CT: BHK