1 2025:CGHC:23056 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1712 of 2025 Abhinav Sharma S/o Susheel Kumar Sharma Aged About 47 Years R/o House No. Q-42/490, Civil Line, Near Irrigation Office, Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus Vibha Sharma W/o Abhinav Sharma Aged About 41 Years R/o Currently Residing Near Barambawa Mandir Near Ward No. 12, Janjgir, P.S. And Tehsil Janjgir, District-Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondent : None Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 11.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.01.2025 passed in TPCR No. 29 of 2024, while allowing the petition of the petitioner namely, Abhinav Sharma, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Principal Judge, Family Court Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 05.05.2025 has requested for grant of two months time for concluding the trial. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that on 10.02.2025, the said case was presented before the Principal Judge, Family Court and was fixed for applicant’s evidence on 20.02.2025. On 20.02.2025, as the Presiding Officer was on leave, the matter was adjourned to 21.02.2025. On 21.02.2025, the date was given on the request of the applicant. The case was again fixed for applicant’s evidence on 10.03.2025; however, on 10.03.2025, as the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, was vacant, the matter was adjourned to 21.04.2025. On 21.04.2025, the matter was again listed for applicant’s evidence. On 26.04.2025, an application was filed by the petitioner to submit documents. The case was thereafter fixed for applicant’s evidence on 03.05.2025. 5. On 03.05.2025, the cross-examination of the petitioner was conducted. However, the remaining part of the cross-examination was deferred on the petitioner’s request stating that her child was alone at home and she could not stay until the end of Court hours. The case was thus adjourned to 08.05.2025 for completion of the remaining cross-examination. Very short dates are being given in the matter and efforts are being made to ensure expeditious disposal of the case. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of two months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal