Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23579 (CHH)

Chhote Lal Dahire v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/4795/2017 · 2025-04-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18668 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4795 of 2017 • Chhote Lal Dahire S/o Late N. L. Dahire, Aged About 60 Years R/o Ayodhya Nagar, Ring Road No. 2, Post Office Mangla, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Vikas Bhavan Civil Lines, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Service, Development Commissioner Office, Vikas Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Project Implementation Unit, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 5. G.M. Ansari, Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Project Implementation Unit, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Rajnish Singh Baghel, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Deputy Government Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case from the office of respondents and direct the respondent No. 2 to hand over the charge of post of Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Executive Engineer C.G.R.R.D.A., Balod by issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs. 10.2 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. At the very outset, Ms. Chetna Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Ms. Chetna Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti