Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010332602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16583 OF 2025 Between: Balireddy Chinnammadu, W/o. Venkata Ramana, Aged about 75 years, Occ; Household Duties, R/o. D.No.2-111, Pedamushidiwada Village, Parawada Mandal. Anakapalli District, Rep.by GPA Holder Gunnam Brammaji Rao S/o. Lakshmana Rao, aged years, Ramalayam Street, Rajavolu, East Godavari District ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintend of Police, Anakapalli District at Anakapalli. 3. The Station House Officer, Parawada Police Station, Anakapalli District. Aiyalavari Veedhi
4. Aila Sathya Swetha, C/o. A. Teja Chandra, Bodasakkuru Village, Allavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5. Galla Rama Lakshmi, D/o. Jaganadham, R/o.Gallavanipallem Street, Aganampudi, 79th Ward, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. 6. Boni Ram Babu, S/o. Boni Tirupathi, Aged about 39 years, Occ Ex Sarpunch, R/o. Pedamushidiwada Village, Parawada Mandal, Anakapalli District. ...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering vyith the property rights of the petitioner with a view to settle civil dispute l^ighhandedly is illegal arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of the ' ^ CQnstitution of India and to consequently direct the respondent no 3 not to interfere with the properly rights of the petitioner and the land admeasuring Ac 3.58 cents in Sy. No.95/3, Pedamushidiwada, Parawada Mandal, Anakapalli District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the property rights of the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.3.58 cents in Sy. No.95/3, Pedamushidiwada, Parawada Mandal, Anakapalli Districtpending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
4 to 6: The Court made the following order:
1 HN,J W.P.No.l6583_2025 APHC010332602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16583/2025 Between:
1.BALIREDDY CHINNAMMADU, W/0. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. OCC HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. D.NO.2-111 PEDAMUSHIDIWADA PARAWADA , MAN DAL, REP.BY GPA HOLDER GUNNAM S/0. LAKSHMANA RAO, AGED YEARS, VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT BRAMMAJI RAO RAMALAYAM STREET, RAJAVOLU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT AT 2.THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, , ANAKAPALLI. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PARAWADA POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. AIYALAVARI 4.AILA SATHYA SWETHA, C/O.
A. TEJA CHANDRA, VEEDHI, BODASAKKURU VILLAGE, ALLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARIDISTRICT. JAGANADHAM, AGANAMPUDI, 79TH WARD, D/0. LAKSHMI, R/O.GALLAVANIPALLEM STREET, RAMA 5.GALLA
2 HN, W.P.No.16583 20'/^ GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6.B0NI RAM BABU, S/0. BONI TIRUPATHI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS OCC EX SARPUNCH PARAWADA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. R/0. PEDAMUSHIDIWADA VILLAGE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the property rights of the petitioner with a view to settle civil dispute highhandedly is illegal arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of the constitution of india and to consequently direct the respondent no 3 not to interfere with the properly rights of the petitioner and the land admeasuring Ac 3.58 cents in lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the property rights of the petitioner over the land admeasuring Ac.3.58 cents in Sy.
No.95/3, Pedamushidiwada, Parawada Mandal, Anakapalli Districtpending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVSATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
3 HN, J W.P.No.l6583_2025 The Court made the following Order:
1. The petitioner submits that the respondent No.3 in interfering with the civil disputes petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2. Heard. 3. Considering the same, this writ petition respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to disturb the following due process of law. There shall be As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ' petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the pending between the is disposed off by directing the peace of the petitioner without no order as to costs. Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SEpTION OFFICER To. 1- The Principal Secretary, Home Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police
3. The Station House District. 4. One CC to Sri V V Satish, Advocate
5. Two CCs to GP for Home,
6. Two CD Copies Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Anakapalli District at Anakapalli. Officer, Parawada Police Station Anakapalli [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] TF
HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 16583 OF 2025 t=* g( 1 I SEP 2025 4S.CurrentS«cti^ ) Co ■ DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS