APHC010001642007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.77 of 2007 Appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, aggrieved by the Order dated 09.06.2006 in O.P.No.667 of 2004 on the file of Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Between: C.V. Subrahmanyam, S/o. Jagannadha Rao, Occ: Tax Consultant, residing at Plot No.333, Visalakshi Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND Chavali Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o. C.V. Subrahmanyam, Aged about 38 years. Housewife, Residing at 58-1-223/1, Old Karasa, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent/ Respondent Counsel for the Appellant; Sri C.V. Subrahmanyam (no representation) Counsel for the Respondent : Sri C V Bhanoji Ramars The Court made the following Judgment: 1 APHC010001642007 nv IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 77/2007 Between: 1.C.V. SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O.JAGANNADHA RAO TAX CONSULTANT RESIDING AT PLOT N0.333, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM ...APPELLANT AND 1.CHAVALI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/o.C.V. Subrahmanyam Housewife Residing at 58-1-223/1, Old Karasa, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 21 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 140 days in preferring the present CMA. Counsel for the Appellant: I.C.V. SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1.C VBHANOJI RAMARS The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND V & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.77 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 28.11.2019, Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submits that long back he gave up his vakalat and returned the bundle to the appellant. He represents the same on 19.07.2024 also. Accordingly on 19.07.2024, this Court directed to issue notice to the appellant by way of speed post and as per the acknowledgment of the Registry, the notice was served on the respondent. 2. On 10.09.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. 3. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non 4. prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri C V Bhanoji Ramars, Advocate [OPUC] 3. C.V. Subrahmanyam, S/o.Jagannadha Rao, Occ: Tax Consultant, residing at Plot No.333, Visalakshi Nagar, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records) 5. Two CD Copies TK sree HIGH COURT DATED;17/09/2025 JUDGMENT FCA No. 77 of 2007 I 2 4 SEP 2025 ^ , ^ . Curreni iieaion m DISMISSING THE FCA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS