APHC010332492020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22067/2020 Between: 1. GANDAM RAMA DEVI,, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU AGED 55 YEARS, HOUSE-WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 41-20/5-53, KALPANA PRINTERS ROAD, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. CHUKKA KOMALI,, W/O PRASAD, HINDU AGED 4L YEARS, HOUSE- WIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-125/1, KUNCHANAPALLI POST, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. GANDAM VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O RAGAVAIAH HINDU AGED 64 YEARS, BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO. 41-20/5-53 KALPANA PRINTERS ROAD, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. GANDAM VENKATARATNAM,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU AGED 33 YEARS, BUSINESS, RIO. D,NO. 41-20/5-53 KALPANA PRINTERS ROAD, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. VEMURI MANGAMMA, W/O DHANUNJAYA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSE-WIFE, RIO. D/NO.46-4-135/1, 131-1 NAGAR, GUNADALA VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. DHANEKULA VENKETESWARA RAO, S/O.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, FARMER, R/O. D.N/O 1- 24 GUNDIMEDA VILLAGE TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. KOMMAREDDY KIRAN MANI, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU AGED 40 YEARS, TDP RURAL PRESIDENT, R/O GUNDIMEDA, NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action things and deeds of Respondents especially 4th Respondent in harassing the Petitioners at the instance of Respondents 5 to 7 by calling them to 4th Respondent Police Station by interfering in Civil disputes and pressurizing them to compromise the Civil dispute with Respondents 5 to 7 and insisting to re-convey the immovable property in their favour which is illegal irregular arbitrary unconstitutional against to the Principles of Natural Justice contra to the guidelines and true spirit of G.O.Ms.No.288 Dated 06.11.2010 issued by the Respondent and in violation of Articles 14 19 21 and 300A of Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents especially 4th Respondent not to harass the Petitioners by calling them to 4th Respondent Police Station in interfering in Civil Disputes” 2. Heard Sri G.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there may be a direction to the respondent-police not to summon the petitioners to the police station without there being any registration of crime against the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to summon the petitioners to the Police Station without there being any registration of crime against them. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22067 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr