Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23553 (AP)

GUMMADI SRIHARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16839/2025 · 2025-07-08

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010333332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16839/2025 Between: 1. GUMMADI SRIHARI, S/O.SANKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. B.V.NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NEIIORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, V-TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. GOLLALACHERUVU LAKSHMI NARAYANAMMA, W/O. CHINNA GURAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.27-2-130, BALAJI NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. LAKKAKULA LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/O. THOTA SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.26/3, FLAT NO. 105, RITWIK ENCLAVE, A.K.NAGAR POST, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ 2 or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents4 and 5 as Illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents 4 and 5 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents 4 and 5 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 3rd respondent at behest of respondents 4 and 5 is interfering in the civil disputes pending between them. 3. Considering the same, the 3rd respondent is hereby directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioner and not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5, without following due process of law. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 09.07.2025 BMS