Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23549 (KAR)

P N NAGENDRASHETTY v. BORAPPA

CRP/622/2018 · 2025-02-11

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6090 CRP No. 622 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 622 OF 2018 BETWEEN: P N NAGENDRASHETTY S/O LATE M. NARASIMHAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A BYADANURU VADDARAHATTI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561202 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARADARAJAN M S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BORAPPA S/O MYEKEBANDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT BYADANURU VADDARAHATTI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561202 2. JAYARAMSETTY S/O P.N.NAGENDRA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 3. THYAGARAJU @ THYAGARAJUSETTY S/O P.N.NAGENDRA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6090 CRP No. 622 of 2018 RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 ARE R/A BYADANURU VADDARAHATTI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561202 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH H.V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 V/O D.20.02.2019, NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS D/W) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2018 PASSED ON IA NO.IV IN OS NO.582/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PAVAGADA DISMISSING THE IA NO.IV FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11[d] OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.582/2012 was dismissed on 26.09.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6090 CRP No. 622 of 2018 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL