Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23547 (GAU)

SHRI R. TEMJEN v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR.

I.A.(Civil)/220/2025 · 2025-11-23

Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020007902025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/220/2025 SHRI R. TEMJEN S/O LT. N. ALEMLA R/O H.NO. 237 WALFORD ROAD, NORTHERN ANGAMI COLONY, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIMAPUR NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : I JAMIR, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date :24-11-2025 Heard Mr. I. Jamir, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. L. T. Sangtam, learned Government Advocate for the respondents. Page No.# 2/2 The present interlocutory application has been instituted by the applicant praying for condonation of delay of 48 days in instituting the connected interlocutory application being I.A(Civil)/219/2025, praying for substitution of the present applicant as the petitioner in WP(C)/43/2025. I have perused the contentions raised by the applicant in the interlocutory application and find that the delay so occasioned has been adequately explained in the matter. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents has also not objected to the condonation of delay. In view of the above, the delay of 48 days in filing the connected interlocutory application being I.A(Civil)/219/2025 stands condoned. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant