NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/5990/2025 · 2025-03-06
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Donadi Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23546 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33695-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5990 of 2025 Petitioner :- Narendra Singh Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
1. Grievance is that Insurance Ombudsman is not considering petitioner's claim after the Insurance Company has repudiated the policy.
2. Perusal of record would go to show that the office of Insurance Ombudsman has already required the petitioner to provide requisite documents. This by way of a letter dated 09.12.2024. Although it is alleged that required information/document has been furnished by the petitioner but the letter by which such information has been furnished does not contain reference to any documents as were required by the office of Insurance Ombudsman. In such circumstance, no direction is called for.
3. However, we provide that if petitioner furnishes required information/document in terms of the demand made by the office of Insurance Ombudsman, the claim of petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
4. Subject to the aforesaid observations made, this petition is consigned to records. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Ashok Kr. Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad