HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10473/2025 Ramsingh Nehra S/o Tejpal Nehra, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Dadiya, Tehsil Arain, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Forest, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur. 2. The Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Van Bhawan, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner participated in the auction proceedings wherein he was a successful bidder and he deposited the amount of auction, but subsequently the auction proceedings were cancelled vide order dated 23.10.2023 with an assertion that fresh bids would be conducted in future. Learned counsel submits that neither fresh bids have been invited in future, nor the amount so deposited by the petitioner has been refunded by the respondents to the petitioner for the reasons best known to them. Learned counsel submits that before approaching this Court, the petitioner served a notice for demand of justice for refund of the auction amount, but till date the said notice/representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents by passing a (2 of 2) [CW-10473/2025] reasoned and speaking order, hence, appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to decide the said representation/notice of the petitioner within a time frame. 2. Considering the limited prayer so made by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representation/notice of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 3. All applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/53