1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4224 of 2021 1 - Anjulata Sonwani W/o Shri Shivshankar Sonwani Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Sonpur, Patnakot, Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh), District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sagar Ravi S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Aged About 24 Years R/o House No. 88, Ward No. 05, Village Keshavpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Lok Shikshan Sanchnalaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Commissioner Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 6 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Collector / President Swami Aatmanand Shaskiy Utkrist (English Medium) High School District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 8 - District Education Officer / Secretary Swami Aatmanand Shaskiy Utkrist (English SMT NIRMALA RAO 2 Medium) High School Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 9 - Deepak Kumar Rajput S/o Shri Rajkumar Village And Post Shardha, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 10 - Smt. Sushma W/o Shri Santosh Jaiswal R/o Village Saigona, Tahsil Khamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 11 - Shiv Kumar Patel S/o Shri Khushiram Patel R/o Village Telipani, Tahsil Pusour, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 12 - Chandrpal Janghle S/o Shri Dulasram Janghle R/o Village Patarjhari, Tahsil Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 13 - Smt. Nilima Mishra W/o Shri Hemsagar Mishra R/o House No. 79, Aadarshnagar, Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None. For Respondents no.1 to 4 & 6/ State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy.G.A. For Other Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 29.07.2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Consequently, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi