Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23539 (AP)

Yetri Sekhar Reddy, v. Sri. M. Harinarayan,

CC/1702/2025 · 2025-09-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010333142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1702/2025 Between: 1. YETRI SEKHAR REDDY,, S/O. SWAMI REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, R/O 2-1-1/4, 26TH WARD, NEAR DANDUBATU ROAD, PRAKASH NAGAR, CHIRALA, BAPTIA (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI M HARINARAYAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READY-MIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SYED ABDUL RASHEED, S/O. NOT KNOWN. WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, CHIRALA MUNICIPALITY, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SMT M NALINI, D/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, CHIRALA, BAPATIA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful and intentional disobedience of Order Dt. 2 12.03.2025 passed in W.P. No. 6067 of 2025 on the file of this Honbie Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri B.Karthik Kiran, learned counsel representing Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non implementation of the order dated 12.03.2025 in W.P.No.6067 of 2025. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that order dated 12.03.2025 in W.P.No.6067 of 2025, has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 11.09.2025 SNI 3 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1702 / 2025 Date: 11.09.2025 SNI