Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23532 (CHH)

Hemant Sahu v. Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation

WPS/3564/2017 · 2025-02-28

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (WPS No. 3564 of 2017) 2025:CGHC:10120 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3564 of 2017 1 - Hemant Sahu S/o Shri Neelkanth Sahu, Aged About 47 Years R/o Tatyapara Ward, Bajrang Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation Through Its President, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, 22, Anand Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, 22, Anand Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation Gudiyari, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Manager Karmik, Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation Head Office, Industrial Building, Ring Road, No.1, Third Floor, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For State :- Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer For Respondent Nos.1,2,4&5 :- Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.03.04 10:59:09 +0530 2 (WPS No. 3564 of 2017) SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28.02.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to approach the Labour Court for redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in this regard. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!