- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9334 WP No. 54556 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 54556 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. K RAGHUNATH SHENOY, S/O LATE PANDURANGA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT V.V.MOHALLA, TEMPLE ROAD MYSURU-570 001. REP. BY HIS P.A HOLDER, K.PRAKASH SHENOY, S/O K SURENDRA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT HALEPETE, P.O. UJIRE - 574 240, BELTHANGADI TALUK (D.K). 2. 2(a) 2(b) 2(c) 2(d) K SURENDRA SHENOY, S/O LATE PANDURANGA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. SINCE DEAD BY LRS. K SUMATHI SHENOY, W/O LATE K SURENDRA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. K PRAKASH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. K PANDURANGA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. K PADMANABHA SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. PETITIONER 2(b) TO (d) ARE Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9334 WP No. 54556 of 2018 2(e) S/O LATE K SURENDRA SHENOY. PETITIONERS 2(a) TO (d) ARE ALL R/AT NEAR VIKRAM LODGE, HALEPETE, POST UJIRE-574 240. BELTHANGADY TALUK (DK). DIVYALAXMI SHENOY, D/O K SURENDRA SHENOY, W/O GURUDATH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NCC URBANITES, MAHADEVAPURA, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI M SUDHAKAR PAI, ADVOCATE FOR P-1 & P-2 [a-e]) AND: 1. MONU BEARY, S/O LATE CHABU BEARY, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS ASIAMMA, W/O LATE MONU BEARY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. 2. UMAR FAROOQ, S/O LATE MONU BEARY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 3. HYDER ALI, S/O LATE MONU BEARY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE, R/AT NEERSAL HOUSE, LAILA VILLAGE, P.O.UJIRE-574 240. BELTHANGADY TALUK (DK). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B LETHIF, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3; R-2 & PROPOSED R-3(b) SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9334 WP No. 54556 of 2018 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 5.11.2018 IN O.S.NO. 30/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY, D.K., VIDE ANNEX-F TO THE W.P. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo dated 05-03-2025 which reads as below: "The Petitioners do not want to prosecute the above writ petition. They seek the leave of this Court to withdraw the said writ petition. WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that the above W.P. may be dismissed as having been withdrawn, in the interest of justice." 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with. All the pending IAs stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25