YUGAL SOUND SERVICE AND ELECTRIC GOODS SUPPLIERS v. V.K. BHATPAHRI
CONT/763/2025 · 2025-05-19
Shri Sachin Singh Rajput
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23527 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23527 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:22117
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 763 of 2025 1 - Yugal Sound Service And Electric Goods Suppliers Through Its Proprietor Shri Umashankar Sahu, Address In Front Lane Of Google Mens, Sai Colony, Jagdalpur, Dist. - Bastar (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - V.K. Bhatpahri The Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist. - Raipur (C.G.), (Contemnors) 2 - Ajay Kumar Tambhurney The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Electrical/ Mechanical), Division Jail Road, Jagdalpur, Dist. - Bastar (C.G
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sachin Singh Rajput
Order On Board 20.05.2025 1) At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2025.05.20 17:34:52 +0530
2 Petition (C) No.5280 of 2024 has passed the following order in para 5 which is reproduced herein-below :-
“5. considering the submission made by the parties, the respondent No.2 Enginee-in- Chief, Department of Public Works is
directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and verify whether the work allotted to the petitioner has been completed or not and if the work has been completed and the claim made by him is undisputed, the outstanding dues be released, in accordance with law, at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from today.” 2) Thereafter, the petitioner has submitted the copy of the
order along with representation vide Annexure C/2 dated 16.01.2025, despite lapse of 3 months, the grievances of the petitioner has not been redressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner goes on to submit that this petition may be
disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the concerned respondent authorities and the concerned respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court in accordance with law. 3) Be that as it may, at this stage, this contempt petition is
disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a further representation before the concerned respondent authorities
3 raising all his grievances along with the copy of the order passed by this Court in WPC No.5280/2024 within the period of 15 days from today and, in turn, concerned respondent authorities are obliged to comply the order of this Court passed in WPC No.5280 of 2024 within an outer limit of 2 months from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 4) If the grievances of the petitioner are not redressed, the petitioner is liberty to avail the remedy available under the law. Certified Copy as per rules. \ Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Arpan