Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23524 (KAR)

VIRGEL INGRED ROWE v. S M ZULFIQUARULLA

RFA/921/2025 · 2025-06-24

Anu Sivaraman, K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22090-DB RFA No. 921 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 921 OF 2025 (EJE) BETWEEN: VIRGEL INGRED ROWE W/O RASOUL KARIMZADEH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT. VILLA No.7 SLS SPENCER JAYANTHI NAGAR, HORAMAVU BENGALURU-560 016 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SYED KHALEEL PASHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. S.M. ZULFIQUARULLA S/O LATE MOHAMMED SANAULLA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT No.72, 1ST MAIN 9TH CROSS BANK OFFICER COLONY MICO LAYOUT BTM 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560 076 2. MANOHAR NENAVAT AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT VILLA No.7, SLS SPENCER JAYANTHI NAGAR, HORAMAVU Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22090-DB RFA No. 921 of 2025 BENGALURU-560 016 ALSO AT No.24/1 8TH CROSS BRINDAVAN LAYOUT HORAMAVU BENGALURU-560 113 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ROHAN TIGADI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2025 PASSED IN OS No.25120/2022 ON THE FILE OF LXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU (CCH- 73) AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo reads as under:- "The undersigned counsel for the Appellant and Appellant in the above case herewith prays before this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22090-DB RFA No. 921 of 2025 above case as withdraw, in view of the above case is settled between Appellant and respondent No.1 in the interest of justice ". 3. The memo is placed on record. 4. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51