Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23518 (RAJ)

RAKESH @ BIHARI S/O INDER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8741/2025 · 2025-08-01

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30356] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8741/2025 Rakesh @ Bihari S/o Inder, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Saimala, Police Station Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City, District Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.230/2015 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 336, 384 & 504 of IPC. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. Counsel submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the learned trial court on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court. He further submits that petitioner has already deposited the fine imposed by the learned [2025:RJ-JP:30356] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8741/2025] trial Court. He thus, prays that the instant bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced at bar, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. The instant bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Rakesh @ Bihari S/o Inder, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /281